If you’re weighing up a move to a retirement village, one of the biggest questions to consider is “Will this help me stay independent for longer?” The short answer, based on national research from the Retirement Living Council, is yes.
Retirement communities are purpose-built to support health, social connection and access to services. That combination tends to delay entry into residential aged care and, for many people, makes “home for longer” or “ageing-in-place” an unexpected upside from the move to a retirement village.
Below is a clear, practical guide as to how that delay happens, what the evidence says, and the pros and cons to consider as you decide what’s right for you.
What the research says
The RLC’s Better Housing for Better Health report pulls together national data on residents and outcomes. Key findings include:
- Later entry to aged care: Retirement communities can delay residents’ entry into residential aged care. Modelling in the report shows that even a one-year delay changes outcomes and costs meaningfully whereas a two-year delay is achievable when supply meets demand and support is well-coordinated.
- Better health and activity: Residents are about 15% more frequently physically active than older people living independently in the wider community, and are 20% less likely to be hospitalised within the first months after moving in.
- Greater social connection and wellbeing: Residents report being up to five times more socially active and 41% happier, which matters because loneliness and inactivity are proven risk factors for needing higher levels of care sooner.
- System-wide benefits: The RLC’s modelling shows that delaying entry to residential aged care by one year could reduce national aged care spending by about $350 million per year; a two-year delay could reduce spending by about $945 million per year. Those figures reflect fewer (or later) high-care placements alongside appropriate home-care support in villages.
Why retirement villages help people stay independent longer
Think of a modern retirement village as “home base”. Your own place, privacy and routines surrounded by the right supports so daily life stays manageable and enjoyable.
- Purpose-built homes
Single-level layouts, step-free entries, good lighting, and smart design reduce falls and fatigue. When the home is easier to live in, people need less hands-on support and can keep doing more for themselves, longer. - On-site community and social life
Regular activities, clubs and friendly neighbours make it simple to stay connected. That social glue isn’t just nice to have, it’s linked with better mood, better cognition, and lower care needs over time. The RLC data showing higher happiness and social activity is one reason villages see later transitions to high care. - Easy access to health and support
Most villages make it straightforward to organise home care (from entry-level help through to higher packages) and allied health (physio, podiatry, exercise physiology). With services coming to you, and with less travel time for workers, care tends to be more efficient and responsive, which helps postpone the need for residential aged care. - Everyday friction removed
Gardening, home maintenance and security are handled by village staff. You can therefore focus you attention into exercise, hobbies and relationships, the very things the research associates with later aged-care entry. - Right support at the right time
Villages are not aged-care facilities, but many are experienced at coordinating visiting services and keeping an eye on early warning signs (e.g., changes in mobility, behaviour, struggling with domestic tasks). Early, light-touch support can prevent small issues becoming hospital admissions—again, a known driver of earlier aged-care placement.
What this might look like in real life
- You downsize to a step-free villa, start using the pool twice a week and join the walking group. Your activity lifts (the report’s 15% figure is a good guide), you fall less, and you avoid a stint in hospital that could have triggered an earlier move to high care.
- You add two hours of domestic assistance and fortnightly physio through your Home Care Package. Because care workers visit multiple residents in the same village, travel time is lower and you get more actual care time helping you manage safely at home.
The upsides, and the watch-outs
Pros
- Independence with backup: Live your own life with help nearby if and when needed.
- Health and happiness: Higher activity, more connection, fewer hospitalisations—each linked to later aged-care entry.
- Financial accessibility: Entry prices are on average 48% lower than median houses in the same area, which can free equity for living costs and care.
Cons / things to check carefully
- Contracts and costs: Retirement village contracts are different from buying a house (e.g., deferred management fees, refurbishment, exit entitlements). Get independent legal and financial advice so you know the real, long-term numbers.
- Care is arranged, not “included”: Villages are not residential aged care; most care is delivered by external providers you choose (often through a Government Home Care Package). Ask how care is coordinated and what happens if your needs increase.
- Future transition: If you eventually need 24/7 clinical support, you may still move to residential aged care. Ask whether the operator has partnerships or priority pathways to nearby aged-care homes.
How to choose a village if delaying aged care is your goal
- Assess the health supports
- Is there a proven process for arranging Home Care Packages and private services?
- Are there on-site or regular visiting allied-health providers, exercise classes and falls-prevention programs?
- Look at design and safety
- Step-free access, wide hallways, good lighting, bathroom safety, emergency call systems. Small design details add up over the years.
- Check the social calendar
- A full, resident-led activity program is a strong signal you’ll have built-in reasons to be active and connected—both linked to later aged-care entry.
- Understand the numbers
- Compare ingoing, ongoing and exit fees; ask for worked examples showing different lengths of stay; and consider how accessing home care will be supported and billed.
- Ask about care pathways
- If your care needs rise, what are the options in place (in-home supports) versus in future (transferring to high care)? Clear pathways reduce stress later.
The last word
For many pepole, moving into a retirement village is a strategic move that helps avoid or delay high-care placement by pairing a right-sized home with community, activity and easy access to support. That’s exactly what the Retirement Living Council’s national research shows: healthier, more connected residents tend to enter residential aged care later, with the strongest outcomes where villages are well-supplied and care is well-coordinated.
If staying independent, active and social is your priority, a retirement village can be a powerful way to make that happen—now, and for the years ahead.
Suggested next read: